↓ Skip to main content

In vitro susceptibility of nematophagous fungi to antiparasitic drugs: interactions and implications for biological control

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Biology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In vitro susceptibility of nematophagous fungi to antiparasitic drugs: interactions and implications for biological control
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Biology, October 2016
DOI 10.1590/1519-6984.15715
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. N. Vieira, F. S. Maia, G. F. Ferreira, J. F. Mendes, C. L. Gonçalves, M. M. Villela, D. I. B. Pereira, P. S. Nascente

Abstract

The fast anthelmintic resistance development has shown a limited efficiency in the control of animal's endoparasitosis and has promoted research using alternative control methods. The use of chemicals in animal anthelmintic treatment, in association with nematophagous fungi used for biological control, is a strategy that has proven to be effective in reducing the nematode population density in farm animals. This study aims to verify the in vitro susceptibility of the nematophagous fungi Arthrobotrys oligospora, Duddingtonia flagrans and Paecilomyces lilacinus against the antiparasitic drugs albendazole, thiabendazole, ivermectin, levamisole and closantel by using the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC). MICs ranged between 4.0 and 0.031 µg/mL for albendazole, thiabendazole and ivermectin, between 0.937 and 0.117 µg/mL for levamisole, and between 0.625 and 0.034 µg/mL for closantel. The results showed that all antiparasitic drugs had an in vitro inhibitory effect on nematophagous fungi, which could compromise their action as agents of biological control. D. flagrans was the most susceptible species to all drugs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%