↓ Skip to main content

Estimation of peacock bass (Cichla spp.) mortality rate during catch-release fishing employing different post-capture procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Biology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Estimation of peacock bass (Cichla spp.) mortality rate during catch-release fishing employing different post-capture procedures
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Biology, August 2017
DOI 10.1590/1519-6984.18915
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The effect of catch-and-release fishing on the survival of peacock bass (Cichla spp.) was evaluated by comparing two types of artificial bait (jig and shallow-diver plugs) and two types of post-catch confinement. Two experiments were conducted during the periods January-February and October-November 2012 in the Unini River, a right-bank tributary of the Negro River. In total, 191 peacock bass were captured. Both groups of fish were subjected to experimental confinement (collective and individual) for three days. Additionally, 11 fish were tagged with radio transmitters for telemetry monitoring. Mortality rate was estimated as the percentage of dead individuals for each type of bait and confinement. For peacock bass caught with jig baits, mortality was zero. The corresponding figure for shallow-diver bait was 1.66% for fish in collective containment, 18.18% for fish monitored by telemetry and 0% for individuals confined individually. Our results show low post-release mortality rates for peacock bass. Furthermore, neither the type of confinement nor the type of bait had a statistically significant influence on mortality rates. While future studies could include other factors in the analysis, our results show that catch-and-release fishing results in low mortality rates.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 65%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 24%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Unknown 12 71%