↓ Skip to main content

Trends and gaps of the scientific literature about the effects of fire on Brazilian Cerrado

Overview of attention for article published in Biota Neotropica, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trends and gaps of the scientific literature about the effects of fire on Brazilian Cerrado
Published in
Biota Neotropica, March 2018
DOI 10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2017-0426
Authors

Filipe Viegas de Arruda, Diego Guimarães de Sousa, Fabrício Barreto Teresa, Vitor Hugo Mendonça do Prado, Hélida Ferreira da Cunha, Thiago Junqueira Izzo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 154 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 19%
Student > Bachelor 26 17%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 37 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 30%
Environmental Science 39 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 5%
Engineering 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 43 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2022.
All research outputs
#17,730,887
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Biota Neotropica
#41
of 66 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,925
of 350,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biota Neotropica
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.