You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pathways to positive scenarios for the Amazon forest in Pará state, Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biota Neotropica, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2019-0905 |
| Authors |
Juliana Siqueira-Gay, Aurora Miho Yanai, Janeth Lessmann, Ana Carolina M. Pessôa, Danilo Borja, Moara Canova, Rafael Cabral Borges |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 18% |
| Chile | 1 | 9% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 50 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 20 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 61 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,260,541
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Biota Neotropica
#8
of 66 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,039
of 481,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biota Neotropica
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.