You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Curcuma tuanii (Zingiberaceae) a new species of subgenus Ecomata from northern Vietnam based on morphological and molecular evidence
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Botanica Brasilica, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.1590/1677-941x-abb-2023-0028 |
Authors |
Hoang Tuan Nguyen, Ngọc Anh Nguyen, Leonid Averyanov, Danh Duc Nguyen, Chi Toan Le |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,733,130
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#240
of 390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,358
of 482,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#13
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 390 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.