Title |
Approaches for in silico finishing of microbial genome sequences
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genetics and Molecular Biology, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2016-0230 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Frederico Schmitt Kremer, Alan John Alexander McBride, Luciano da Silva Pinto |
Abstract |
The introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) had a significant effect on the availability of genomic information, leading to an increase in the number of sequenced genomes from a large spectrum of organisms. Unfortunately, due to the limitations implied by the short-read sequencing platforms, most of these newly sequenced genomes remained as "drafts", incomplete representations of the whole genetic content. The previous genome sequencing studies indicated that finishing a genome sequenced by NGS, even bacteria, may require additional sequencing to fill the gaps, making the entire process very expensive. As such, several in silico approaches have been developed to optimize the genome assemblies and facilitate the finishing process. The present review aims to explore some free (open source, in many cases) tools that are available to facilitate genome finishing. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 26 | 23% |
Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 11% |
Unknown | 24 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 29% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 25% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 6% |
Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 8% |
Unknown | 26 | 23% |