You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical and x-ray oral evaluation in patients with congenital Zika Virus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0276 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Isabella Fernandes Carvalho, Phillipe Nogueira Barbosa Alencar, Maria Denise Carvalho de Andrade, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva, Ellaine Dóris Fernandes Carvalho, Lavina Sousa Araújo, Michelly Pedrosa Monteiro Cavalcante, Fabrício Bitú Sousa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 42% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#216
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,357
of 446,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#10
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.