You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a comparison of two different photosensitizers and light sources
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1678-775720130038 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neda HAKIMIHA, Farzaneh KHOEI, Abbas BAHADOR, Reza FEKRAZAD |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#496
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,089
of 239,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.