↓ Skip to main content

Finite element analysis of rapid canine retraction through reducing resistance and distraction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Finite element analysis of rapid canine retraction through reducing resistance and distraction
Published in
Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2014
DOI 10.1590/1678-775720130365
Pubmed ID
Authors

Junjie Xue, Niansong Ye, Xin Yang, Sheng Wang, Jing Wang, Yan Wang, Jingyu Li, Congbo Mi, Wenli Lai

Abstract

The aims of this study were to compare different surgical approaches to rapid canine retraction by designing and selecting the most effective method of reducing resistance by a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 21%
Student > Postgraduate 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 64%
Engineering 2 4%
Materials Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#496
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,470
of 319,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#21
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.