You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Perceptions of brachyfacial, mesofacial and dolichofacial individuals with regard to the buccal corridor in different facial types
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1590/1678-775720140003 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Matheus Melo PITHON, Kayure Rocha da MATA, Karina Silva ROCHA, Brenda do Nascimento COSTA, Fernando NEVES, George Caique Gouveia BARBOSA, Raildo da Silva COQUEIRO |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 19 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 53% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 19 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#101
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,566
of 319,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.