↓ Skip to main content

Adjuvant radiotherapy versus observation alone, after radical prostatectomy in high risk prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adjuvant radiotherapy versus observation alone, after radical prostatectomy in high risk prostate cancer
Published in
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, August 2015
DOI 10.1590/1806-9282.61.04.324
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Petruzziello, Massakazu Kato, Lais Cristine Nienkotter, Luis Felipe Matiusso de Souza, Luiz Antônio Negrão Dias, Murilo Luz

Abstract

SummaryObjectives:the authors compared biochemical and clinical outcomes of patients with resected high-risk prostate cancer, managed with adjuvant radiotherapy or observation alone. patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) between January 1995 and December 2005 at the authors' department were evaluated. Patients with pT3, with or without positive surgical margins (PSM), were included for analysis. Demographic, clinical, pathologic and follow-up data were recorded. Comparison was made between adjuvant radiotherapy group (AR) and observation alone group (OA). Primary end-point was biochemical progression-free survival. out of 739 patients treated with RP, 49 presented with pT3 with or without PSM. 39 received adjuvant radiotherapy and 10 were observed. Median follow- up was 6.2 years for AR and 7.3 years for OA. Biochemical progression occurred in 12.8%, in AR, and 70%, in OA (p=0.0008). Five-year biochemical progression-free survival was 87.1% in AR and 30% in OA (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03- 0.48 - p<0.0001). Rescue androgen deprivation therapy was needed in 2.6%, in AR, and 30%, in OA (p=0.023). adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer provided better biochemical outcomes. Whether this translates into better clinical progression, it is still unknown.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Librarian 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Computer Science 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 16%