↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors and complications in type 2 diabetes outpatients

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
494 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Risk factors and complications in type 2 diabetes outpatients
Published in
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, July 2017
DOI 10.1590/1806-9282.63.07.621
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen Fernandes Flávio Silva, Cristiane Maria Mendes Ferreira, Lucineia de Pinho

Abstract

Our study investigated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) outpatients attending a university hospital in Montes Claros, MG, to estimate the prevalence of risk factors and their association with diabetes complications. This was a quantitative, documental, retrospective and analytical study. Medical records of 95 outpatients with T2DM treated in this hospital from 2011 to 2015 were analyzed. Data were collected according to a structured questionnaire surveying sociodemographic, anthropometric and biochemical data and clinical and lifestyle aspects. Regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between risk factor variables and complications. With a mean age of 54 years, the study population showed irregular blood glucose control, despite the use of hypoglycemic medication, and did not have a healthy lifestyle. The main complication reported was high blood pressure (HBP), occurring in 70.9% of patients. The prevalence of complications was positively associated with patients receiving insulin treatment (p=0.042) and multidisciplinary monitoring (p=0.050). The associations identified reflect the condition of patients that were already treating diabetes and its complications, especially HBP. The characteristics of the study population indicate the need to improve clinical follow-up and increase motivation for healthy behaviors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 494 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 494 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 9%
Student > Master 20 4%
Student > Postgraduate 11 2%
Lecturer 10 2%
Researcher 9 2%
Other 31 6%
Unknown 370 75%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 1%
Other 21 4%
Unknown 372 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#403
of 1,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,092
of 326,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.