↓ Skip to main content

Association between painful temporomandibular disorders, sleep bruxism and tinnitus

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Oral Research, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between painful temporomandibular disorders, sleep bruxism and tinnitus
Published in
Brazilian Oral Research, May 2014
DOI 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2014.vol28.0003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovana Fernandes, José Tadeu Tesseroli de Siqueira, Daniela Aparecida de Godoi Gonçalves, Cinara Maria Camparis

Abstract

The present cross-sectional study was designed to investigate the association between sleep bruxism (SB), tinnitus and temporomandibular disorders (TMD). The sample consisted of 261 women (mean age of 37.0 years). The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders were used to classify TMD and self-reported tinnitus. SB was diagnosed by clinical criteria proposed by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The results showed an association between painful TMD and tinnitus (OR = 7.3; 95%CI = 3.50-15.39; p < 0.001). With regard to SB, the association was of lower magnitude (OR = 1.9; 95%CI = 1.16-3.26; p < 0.0163). When the sample was stratified by the presence of SB and painful TMD, only SB showed no association with tinnitus. The presence of painful TMD without SB was significantly associated with tinnitus (OR = 6.7; 95%CI = 2.64-17.22; p < 0.0001). The concomitant presence of painful TMD and SB was associated with a higher degree of tinnitus severity (OR = 7.0; 95%CI = 3.00-15.89; p < 0.0001). It may be concluded that there is an association between SB, painful TMD and self-reported tinnitus; however, no relationship of a causal nature could be established.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 152 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Student > Postgraduate 18 11%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Other 33 21%
Unknown 39 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Materials Science 2 1%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 48 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Oral Research
#296
of 509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,038
of 241,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Oral Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 509 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them