↓ Skip to main content

Zika virus infection spread through saliva – a truth or myth?

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Oral Research, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 502)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Zika virus infection spread through saliva – a truth or myth?
Published in
Brazilian Oral Research, March 2016
DOI 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2016.vol30.0046
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In this Point-of-view article we highlighted some features related to saliva and virus infection, in special for zika virus. In addition, we pointed out the potential oral problems caused by a microcephaly originated by a zika virus infection. In the end the, we demonstrated the importance of a more comprehensive exploration of saliva and their components as a fluid for diagnostic and therapeutic approaches on oral and systemic diseases.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 4 3%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 116 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 17%
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 25 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,130,058
of 29,485,101 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Oral Research
#7
of 502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,229
of 320,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Oral Research
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,485,101 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 502 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.