You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Root canal preparation using micro-computed tomography analysis: a literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Oral Research, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0066 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manoel Damião de Sousa-Neto, Yara Correa Silva-Sousa, Jardel Francisco Mazzi-Chaves, Kleber Kildare Teodoro Carvalho, Ana Flávia Simões Barbosa, Marco Aurélio Versiani, Reinhilde Jacobs, Graziela Bianchi Leoni |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 164 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Professor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 67 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 47% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Psychology | 2 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 76 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,371,676
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Oral Research
#21
of 509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,004
of 359,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Oral Research
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 509 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.