You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Treatment of peri-implant soft tissue defects: a narrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Oral Research, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0073 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fausto Frizzera, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira, Jamil Awad Shibli, Kely Cristina de Moraes, Eloísa Boeck Marcantonio, Elcio Marcantonio Junior |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 45 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 42% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,540,769
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Oral Research
#65
of 509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,704
of 446,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Oral Research
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 509 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.