↓ Skip to main content

Freud and the question of the feminine: mythical assumptions of clinical practice

Overview of attention for article published in Ágora: Estudos em Teoria Psicanalítica, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 149)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Freud and the question of the feminine: mythical assumptions of clinical practice
Published in
Ágora: Estudos em Teoria Psicanalítica, September 2020
DOI 10.1590/1809-44142020003010
Authors

Elizabeth Fátima Teodoro, Wilson Camilo Chaves, Mardem Leandro Silva

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#16,059,145
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Ágora: Estudos em Teoria Psicanalítica
#42
of 149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,265
of 424,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ágora: Estudos em Teoria Psicanalítica
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.