↓ Skip to main content

(Re)learn to walk: The melodramatic narrative strategy in Garden of Words

Overview of attention for article published in Intercom: Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Comunicação, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
(Re)learn to walk: The melodramatic narrative strategy in Garden of Words
Published in
Intercom: Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Comunicação, January 2023
DOI 10.1590/1809-58442023119en
Authors

Thátilla Sousa Santos, Lara Lima Satler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2023.
All research outputs
#20,674,485
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Intercom: Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Comunicação
#109
of 270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#351,540
of 475,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intercom: Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Comunicação
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 270 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.