↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin A status and associated factors in infants attending at Primary Health Care in Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vitamin A status and associated factors in infants attending at Primary Health Care in Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, June 2015
DOI 10.1590/1980-5497201500020016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lara Lívia Santos da Silva, Maria do Rosário Gondim Peixoto, Maria Claret Costa Monteiro Hadler, Sara Araújo da Silva, Fernanda Cobayashi, Marly Augusto Cardoso

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the nutritional status of vitamin A and associated factors in children assisted in Primary Care Health in Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil. This is a cross-sectional study with a sample of 228 children 12 to 16 months of age. The nutritional status of vitamin A was assessed by serum retinol concentration, determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Multiple linear regression models with hierarchical selection of independent variables were used to evaluate the correlation with serum retinol as the dependent variable. The vitamin A deficiency (retinol < 0,7 μmol/L) was observed in 14,0% of the children. Maternal schooling and hemoglobin concentration were positively correlated with serum retinol concentration, while C-reactive protein showed a negative correlation (R2 = 0,1648). The vitamin A deficiency in one-year-old children attended in Basic Health Units in Goiânia configures itself as a moderate public health problem. Actions to promote maternal education, morbidity control and prevention of other micronutrient deficiencies are important for prevention and control of the vitamin A deficiency in this population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Unknown 30 86%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unknown 30 86%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#285
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,513
of 281,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.