↓ Skip to main content

Diet quality index and its components have not associated with the development of breast cancer risk assessed by the diet quality index: a case-control study

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diet quality index and its components have not associated with the development of breast cancer risk assessed by the diet quality index: a case-control study
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, January 2022
DOI 10.1590/1980-549720220027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luan Miranda de Godoy, Marina Alves Pinheiro, Jordana Carolina Marques Godinho-Mota, Larissa Vaz-Gonçalves, Raquel Machado Schincaglia, Karine Anusca Martins, Luciana Bronzi de Souza

Abstract

To investigate if the diet quality and its components are associated with breast cancer risk. A case-control study was conducted with 332 women, 114 who were diagnosed with breast cancer, and 218 control individuals. Groups were matched for age, body mass index, and menopausal status. The quality of diet was assessed using Brazilian Healthy Eating Index Revised (BHEI-R) and its components. Food consumption was measured through three 24-h dietary recalls and assessed using the NDS-R software. For statistical analyses, it was performed an adjusted logistic regression, estimation of the Odds Ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (95%CI), with a p-value <0.05. The BHEI-R score, classified into quartiles, did not differ between groups in the lowest quartile of diet quality (p=0.853). The components total cereals (p=0.038), saturated fat (p=0.039) and Gord_AA (fat, alcohol, and added sugar) (p=0.023) had higher scores among the case group. The scores for total fruits (p=0.010) and milk and dairy products (p=0.039) were higher among the control group. The BHEI-R components and the quality of diet were not associated with the outcome. Diet quality, assessed by the BHEI-R and its components, was not associated with breast cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 9 69%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Unknown 9 69%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2022.
All research outputs
#20,673,680
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#284
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#388,012
of 515,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#11
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.