↓ Skip to main content

Logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia in a bilingual non-Alzheimer’s disease octogenarian

Overview of attention for article published in Dementia & Neuropsychologia, January 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia in a bilingual non-Alzheimer’s disease octogenarian
Published in
Dementia & Neuropsychologia, January 2026
DOI 10.1590/1980-5764-dn-2025-0379
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A highly educated and intellectually active 84-year-old male presented with word-finding pauses and impaired sentence repetition, with preserved single-word comprehension, reading, and writing, a clinical profile consistent with the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA). Interestingly, the initial symptom was difficulty with auditory verbal comprehension in Portuguese, his second language, while comprehension in English remained initially preserved. Structural and functional imaging revealed no atrophy in the temporoparietal region or cortical hypometabolism. Plasma biomarkers, including Aβ42/40 and plasma-measured tau phosphorylated at threonine 217 (p-tau217), were within normal limits, arguing against biological Alzheimer's disease (AD). This case illustrates a rare constellation of findings - bilingual asymmetry, negative AD biomarkers, and unremarkable neuroimaging - suggestive of a non-Alzheimer's pathology. Alternative etiologies such as primary age-related tauopathy (PART) and argyrophilic grain disease (AGD) are discussed, emphasizing the utility of fluid biomarkers in distinguishing phenocopies within the lvPPA spectrum.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2026.
All research outputs
#6,261,321
of 32,632,530 outputs
Outputs from Dementia & Neuropsychologia
#98
of 399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,828
of 355,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dementia & Neuropsychologia
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,632,530 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 399 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.