↓ Skip to main content

Type 2 diabetes mellitus in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Dementia & Neuropsychologia, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Type 2 diabetes mellitus in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease
Published in
Dementia & Neuropsychologia, January 2017
DOI 10.1590/1980-57642016dn11-020002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Both Alzheimer's disease (AD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) are two common forms of disease worldwide and many studies indicate that people with diabetes, especially DM, are at higher risk of developing AD. AD is characterized by progressive cognitive decline and accumulation of β-amyloid (Aβ) forming senile plaques. DM is a metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycemia in the context of insulin resistance and relative lack of insulin. Both diseases also share common characteristics such as loss of cognitive function and inflammation. Inflammation resulting from Aβ further induces production of Aβ1-42 peptides. Inflammation due to overnutrition induces insulin resistance and consequently DM. Memory deficit and a decrease in GLUT4 and hippocampal insulin signaling have been observed in animal models of insulin resistance. The objective of this review was to show the shared characteristics of AD and DM.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Master 8 7%
Other 7 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 37 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 13%
Neuroscience 10 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 40 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2024.
All research outputs
#3,418,263
of 34,115,020 outputs
Outputs from Dementia & Neuropsychologia
#60
of 421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,330
of 462,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dementia & Neuropsychologia
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,115,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.