↓ Skip to main content

Can musical intervention improve memory in Alzheimer’s patients? Evidence from a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Dementia & Neuropsychologia, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 436)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
15 X users
reddit
2 Redditors
podcasts
2 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Can musical intervention improve memory in Alzheimer’s patients? Evidence from a systematic review
Published in
Dementia & Neuropsychologia, June 2018
DOI 10.1590/1980-57642018dn12-020005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Treatment with music has shown effectiveness in the treatment of general behavioural and cognitive symptoms of patients with various types of dementia. To assess the effectiveness of treatment with music on the memory of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). A systematic search was performed on PubMed (Medline), Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Lilacs databases up to June 2017 and included all randomized controlled trials that assessed memory using musical interventions in patients with AD. Forty-two studies were identified, and 24 studies were selected. After applying the exclusion criteria, four studies involving 179 patients were included. These studies showed the benefits of using music to treat memory deficit in patients with AD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review focusing on randomized trials found in the literature that analysed the role of musical interventions specifically in the memory of patients with AD. Despite the positive outcome of this review, the available evidence remains inconsistent due to the small number of randomized controlled trials.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 214 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 21%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Researcher 10 5%
Student > Postgraduate 6 3%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 95 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 11%
Arts and Humanities 13 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 99 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 188. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#267,941
of 34,550,734 outputs
Outputs from Dementia & Neuropsychologia
#4
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,627
of 374,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dementia & Neuropsychologia
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,550,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them