↓ Skip to main content

Receiving the mantle: perspectives from third generation researchers in Gurupá

Overview of attention for article published in Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Receiving the mantle: perspectives from third generation researchers in Gurupá
Published in
Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, January 2015
DOI 10.1590/1981-81222014000300011
Authors

Monte Talley, Cynthia Pace, Lucy Miller, Simon Hurst-Dodd

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2015.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas
#82
of 370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,824
of 359,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 370 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.