You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for Alternative and Augmentative Communication
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista CEFAC, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1982-0216201820318017 |
| Authors |
Ítala da Piedade Queiroz, Edênia da Cunha Menezes, Ivana Maria Barboza dos Santos, Ueslane Melo de Goes, Rosana Carla do Nascimento Givigi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 2 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Revista CEFAC
#227
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,886
of 339,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista CEFAC
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them