You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relações entre produtividade acadêmica e redes sociais entre pesquisadores da Ciência Psicológica
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1982-02752016000100009 |
| Authors |
Elaine Rabelo NEIVA, Carolina Carvalho FUSSI, Ariane Agnes CORRADI |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 25% |
| Professor | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 2 | 25% |
| Psychology | 2 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 25% |
| Engineering | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2016.
All research outputs
#5,755,269
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
#38
of 183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,159
of 298,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas)
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them