↓ Skip to main content

The care for institutionalized elderly perceived by the nursing team

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The care for institutionalized elderly perceived by the nursing team
Published in
Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, March 2015
DOI 10.1590/1983-1447.2015.01.45636
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabíola de Araújo Leite Medeiros, Jullyana Marion Medeiros Oliveira, Raquel Janyne de Lima, Maria Miriam Lima da Nóbrega

Abstract

This article aimed to analyze the perception of the nursing team about the care of institutionalized elderly. It consists of a qualitative and exploratory study developed in the six long-term care nursing homes for elderly in the city of João Pessoa/PB, Brazil, from January to June 2013. The sample was comprised 50% of the nurses from all the institutions, totaling 13 participants, whose data were collected through semi-structured questionnaires. Content analysis was used in the study, which enabled the construction of two thematic categories: I) Perceptions of the delivery of care by the nursing staff of the institutions; II) Perceptions of the care activity to be performed by the nursing staff in the institutions. We conclude that the participants are aware of the need for an individualized and systematized care by the nursing staff, aimed to the prevention of diseases, health promotion and active aging.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 7%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Sports and Recreations 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2015.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#87
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,126
of 270,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.