↓ Skip to main content

Safety elements and understanding of guidelines at discharge from Neonatal Intensive Care Units

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety elements and understanding of guidelines at discharge from Neonatal Intensive Care Units
Published in
Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, January 2022
DOI 10.1590/1983-1447.2022.20210262.en
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruna Gomes Pucca, Mara Regina Rosa Ribeiro, Aline Marques Acosta, Diovane Ghignatti da Costa, Kelly Cristina Milioni, João Lucas Campos de Oliveira

Abstract

To compare safety elements and the understanding of guidelines at discharge from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit between public and private hospitals. Cross-sectional study, developed in two Neonatal Intensive Care Units in the Midwest of Brazil. The Checklist for patient safety in preparing for discharge from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and the Assessment Scale of Patient Understanding about Discharge Guidelines were used for a sample (n=105) of caregivers of newborns. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was performed. The Checklist item "skin care and body hygiene" had greater conformity in the private sector (96.9%) than in the public sector (73.2%) (p-value<0.000) and the understanding of discharge guidelines had an overall mean of 62.9±8.3 points, with no significant difference between the locations. Compliance with safety elements and understanding of guidelines at discharge were equal among hospitals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 18%
Librarian 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Unknown 7 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2022.
All research outputs
#22,778,604
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#180
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#439,986
of 515,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#20
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.