You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PHYSICAL-HYDRAULIC ATTRIBUTES AS INDICATORS OF FUNCTIONALITY OF SOIL PORES UNDER DIFFERENT COMPACTION LEVELS1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Caatinga, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1983-21252022v35n416rc |
| Authors |
FRANCISCA GLEICIANE DA SILVA, RAIMUNDO NONATO DE ASSIS, RAUL SHISO TOMA, LUCAS DE SOUSA OLIVEIRA, EDILAINE DA SILVA MARQUES, JAEDSON CLÁUDIO ANUNCIATO MOTA |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,840,893
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Revista Caatinga
#1
of 46 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,378
of 439,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Caatinga
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one scored the same or higher as 45 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them