You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
RESENHA DE A VOLUPTUOSIDADE DO NADA: NIILISMO E GALHOFA EM MACHADO DE ASSIS, DE VITOR CEI
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Machado de Assis em Linha, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1983-68212018112512 |
| Authors |
REGINA SANCHES XAVIER |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2018.
All research outputs
#16,968,084
of 25,711,998 outputs
Outputs from Machado de Assis em Linha
#55
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,812
of 448,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Machado de Assis em Linha
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.