↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 475)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 X users
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (aHUS): an expert consensus statement from the Rare Diseases Committee of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology (COMDORA-SBN)
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Nephrology, January 2025
DOI 10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2024-0087en
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare cause of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) caused by the dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway. The diagnosis of TMA is made clinically by the triad: microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and organ damage (mainly acute kidney injury). The heterogeneity of clinical manifestation and the lack of a gold standard diagnostic test makes the precise diagnosis of aHUS a challenging process that may impact patient management. Until one decade ago, there was no specific treatment for aHUS and patients were submitted to plasma therapy (plasma exchange and/or plasma infusion) and/or liver transplantation, procedures that are not free of serious complications and that do not address the underlying pathophysiology of the disease. Since 2011, an anti-C5 complement monoclonal antibody has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for aHUS patients beginning a new era in treatment. Clinical trials on new complement inhibitors may also add to the treatment portfolio in the future. The Brazilian population is a mixed race with a unique genetic and clinical profile. This consensus aims to offer recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with aHUS in this population based on expert experience, data from the aHUS Brazilian Registry and literature review. The GRADE system was used to classify the quality of the evidence.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 71%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Computer Science 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 17 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2025.
All research outputs
#3,456,451
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Nephrology
#20
of 475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,849
of 405,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Nephrology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 475 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.