↓ Skip to main content

Machado de Assis e a crítica às avessas

Overview of attention for article published in Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estudos do Discurso, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 170)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Machado de Assis e a crítica às avessas
Published in
Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estudos do Discurso, April 2015
DOI 10.1590/2176-457320943
Authors

Sílvia Maria Azevedo

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,436,572
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estudos do Discurso
#31
of 170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,730
of 280,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estudos do Discurso
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 170 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.