↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 107)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
DECREPIT, ANEMIC AND TUBERCULOUS: AFRICAN PATIENTS IN THE SANTA CASA DE MISERICÓRDIA HOSPITAL (BAHIA, BRAZIL, 1867-1872)
Published in
Almanack, August 2019
DOI 10.1590/2236-463320192206
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2025.
All research outputs
#8,572,715
of 28,923,790 outputs
Outputs from Almanack
#33
of 107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,971
of 365,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Almanack
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,923,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 107 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them