You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Screening tools for dysphagia: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CoDAS, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1590/2317-1782/20142014057 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Camila Lucia Etges, Betina Scheeren, Erissandra Gomes, Lisiane De Rosa Barbosa |
| Abstract |
To perform a systematic review of screening instruments for dysphagia available in the literature. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 194 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 13% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 16% |
| Unknown | 64 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 49 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 70 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2020.
All research outputs
#8,784,015
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from CoDAS
#2
of 5 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,402
of 266,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CoDAS
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.