↓ Skip to main content

Morphosyntactic Evaluation Protocol (MEP): validation of content

Overview of attention for article published in CoDAS, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Morphosyntactic Evaluation Protocol (MEP): validation of content
Published in
CoDAS, January 2020
DOI 10.1590/2317-1782/20202019148
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorena Adami da Cruz Pinheiro, Anilton Pinheiro da Silva, Simone Rocha de Vasconcellos Hage

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Librarian 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 10 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 16%
Unspecified 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Psychology 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2020.
All research outputs
#17,011,197
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from CoDAS
#33
of 92 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,826
of 481,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CoDAS
#8
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.