↓ Skip to main content

Short- and long-term memory: differential involvement of neurotransmitter systems and signal transduction cascades

Overview of attention for article published in Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, September 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Short- and long-term memory: differential involvement of neurotransmitter systems and signal transduction cascades
Published in
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, September 2000
DOI 10.1590/s0001-37652000000300009
Pubmed ID
Authors

MÔNICA R.M. VIANNA, LUCIANA A. IZQUIERDO, DANIELA M. BARROS, ROGER WALZ, JORGE H. MEDINA, IVÁN IZQUIERDO

Abstract

Since William James (1890) first distinguished primary from secondary memory, equivalent to short- and long-term memory, respectively, it has been assumed that short-term memory processes are in charge of cognition while long-term memory is being consolidated. From those days a major question has been whether short-term memory is merely a initial phase of long-term memory, or a separate phenomena. Recent experiments have shown that many treatments with specific molecular actions given into the hippocampus and related brain areas after one-trial avoidance learning can effectively cancel short-term memory without affecting long-term memory formation. This shows that short-term memory and long-term memory involve separate mechanisms and are independently processed. Other treatments, however, influence both memory types similarly, suggesting links between both at the receptor and at the post-receptor level, which should not be surprising as they both deal with nearly the same sensorimotor representations. This review examines recent advances in short- and long-term memory mechanisms based on the effect of intra-hippocampal infusion of drugs acting upon neurotransmitter and signal transduction systems on both memory types.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 100 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Student > Master 11 10%
Professor 9 9%
Researcher 9 9%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 26%
Neuroscience 17 16%
Psychology 12 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 24 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2018.
All research outputs
#21,155,664
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências
#3
of 3 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,276
of 38,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them