↓ Skip to main content

Miocardiopatia diabética

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Miocardiopatia diabética
Published in
Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, May 2007
DOI 10.1590/s0004-27302007000200004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katashi Okoshi, Julliano F. Campos Guimarães, Bruno Paulino Di Muzio, Ana Angélica H. Fernandes, Marina Politi Okoshi

Abstract

Diabetic cardiomyopathy is a myocardial disease caused by diabetes mellitus unrelated to vascular and valvular pathology or systemic arterial hypertension. Clinical and experimental studies have shown that diabetes mellitus causes myocardial hypertrophy, necrosis, and apoptosis, and increases interstitial tissue. The pathophysiology of diabetic cardiomyopathy is incompletely understood. It appears that metabolic perturbations such as hyperlipidemia, hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, and changes in cardiac metabolism are involved in cellular consequences leading to increased oxidative stress, interstitial fibrosis, myocyte death, and altered intracellular ions transient and calcium homeostasis. Clinically, an early detection of asymptomatic diastolic dysfunction is possible. When patients develop signals and symptoms of heart failure, isolated diastolic dysfunction is usually detected. Systolic dysfunction is a late finding. Treatment of heart failure due to diabetic cardiomyopathy is not different from myocardiopathies of other etiologies and must follow the guidelines according to ventricular function, whether diastolic or diastolic and systolic impairment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,778,071
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism
#151
of 800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,949
of 86,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 800 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.