↓ Skip to main content

Miocardiopatia diabética

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 162)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Miocardiopatia diabética
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia, May 2007
DOI 10.1590/s0004-27302007000200004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Diabetic cardiomyopathy is a myocardial disease caused by diabetes mellitus unrelated to vascular and valvular pathology or systemic arterial hypertension. Clinical and experimental studies have shown that diabetes mellitus causes myocardial hypertrophy, necrosis, and apoptosis, and increases interstitial tissue. The pathophysiology of diabetic cardiomyopathy is incompletely understood. It appears that metabolic perturbations such as hyperlipidemia, hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, and changes in cardiac metabolism are involved in cellular consequences leading to increased oxidative stress, interstitial fibrosis, myocyte death, and altered intracellular ions transient and calcium homeostasis. Clinically, an early detection of asymptomatic diastolic dysfunction is possible. When patients develop signals and symptoms of heart failure, isolated diastolic dysfunction is usually detected. Systolic dysfunction is a late finding. Treatment of heart failure due to diabetic cardiomyopathy is not different from myocardiopathies of other etiologies and must follow the guidelines according to ventricular function, whether diastolic or diastolic and systolic impairment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Sports and Recreations 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2014.
All research outputs
#8,694,819
of 27,778,980 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia
#38
of 162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,923
of 95,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,778,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.