You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tear film and ocular surface alterations in chronic users of antiglaucoma medications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0004-27492008000100004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lina do Prado Baffa, Jose Reinaldo da Silva Ricardo, Ana Carolina Dias, Carolina Maria Módulo, Alexandre Martins Braz, Jayter Silva de Paula, Maria de Lourdes Veronese Rodrigues, Eduardo Melani Rocha |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 95% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
#52
of 446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,815
of 172,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 446 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them