↓ Skip to main content

Multiple sclerosis: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the modified fatigue impact scale

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiple sclerosis: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the modified fatigue impact scale
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, September 2007
DOI 10.1590/s0004-282x2007000400024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karina Pavan, Kizi Schmidt, Bruna Marangoni, Maria Fernanda Mendes, Charles Peter Tilbery, Sergio Lianza

Abstract

The aim of this study is a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the modified fatigue impact scale for Portuguese (MFIS-BR). The MFIS was translated to Portuguese and re-translated to English. Two pilot studies had been carried through to obtain the MFIS-BR, which was applied to 57 consecutive stable MS patients and 45 healthy controls. The retest was applied 30 days later. In analyzing the statistics the internal consistency reability was similar to the original scale (0.74-0.86). The MFIS-BR showed ability to identify the different groups. Concerning the reliability the interclass correlation coefficient showed an excellent agreement (0.264-1.0). The MFIS-BR fills the criteria of applicability, sensibility which are similar to the original version.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Postgraduate 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 9 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 41%