↓ Skip to main content

Análise comparativa da qualidade de panificação e rendimento de grãos entre tritórdeo hexaplóide e outros cereais de inverno

Overview of attention for article published in Bragantia, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Análise comparativa da qualidade de panificação e rendimento de grãos entre tritórdeo hexaplóide e outros cereais de inverno
Published in
Bragantia, March 2004
DOI 10.1590/s0006-87052003000100001
Authors

Ronald José Barth Pinto, Carlos Alberto Scapim, Juan Bautista Alvarez, Luis Miguel Martin Martin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Bragantia
#21
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,516
of 63,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bragantia
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.