You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
O papel dos antagonistas periféricos dos opióides no tratamento da dor e nos cuidados perioperatórios
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Science Direct), October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0034-70942008000500011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pedro Paulo Tanaka, Jonathan Moss |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 40% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2015.
All research outputs
#23,320,957
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Science Direct)
#2
of 2 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,821
of 102,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Science Direct)
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.