You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intraoperative Volume Replacement: Crystalloids Versus Colloids In Surgical Myocardial Revascularization Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Science Direct), July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0034-70942009000400006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raquel Reis Soares, Leonardo Ferber, Michelle Nacur Lorentz, Marjorie Taboada Soldati |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 25% |
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 63% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,784,015
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Science Direct)
#2
of 2 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,937
of 124,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Science Direct)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them