You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reação cutânea grave induzida por carbamazepina no tratamento da neuralgia pós-herpética: relato de caso
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Science Direct), August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0034-70942010000400011 |
| Authors |
João Batista Santos Garcia, Letácio Santos Garcia Ferro, Anamada Barros Carvalho, Rosyane Moura da Rocha, Livia Maria Lima de Souza |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 67% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 33% |
| Engineering | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,505,156
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Science Direct)
#2
of 2 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,875
of 106,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Science Direct)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them