↓ Skip to main content

Raptors and "campo-cerrado" bird mixed flock led by Cypsnagra Hirundinacea (Emberizidae:Thraupinae)

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Biologia, February 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
29 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Raptors and "campo-cerrado" bird mixed flock led by Cypsnagra Hirundinacea (Emberizidae:Thraupinae)
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Biologia, February 2001
DOI 10.1590/s0034-71082000000300011
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Bird mixed flocks including Cypsnagra hirundinacea and Neothraupis fasciata as species with sentinels were studied in "campo-cerrado" in order to investigate the possible relationship between alertness and the mixed flock leadership. This study was conducted from March to September 1996 and mixed flocks were observed on average for 2:30h. The time with sentinels were recorded for C. hirundinacea and N. fasciata. The sentinels of Cypsnagra hirundinacea performed most of the vigilance (time with sentinel was on average 42 +/- 17%, 41 +/- 17% of which by C. hirundinacea, whereas only 1.2% by N. fasciata) and gave all the alarm calls recorded (54% of the encounters with raptors stimulated alarm calls). A relationship was verified between time with sentinel and the rate of encounters with raptor (ANOVA, F = 3.0. P < 0.05). The results of this study are an evidence for the anti-predatory function of mixed flocks, in campo-cerrado, and the alertness as a major feature of a leader species, since C. hirundinacea always led those flocks.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 6 8%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 66 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Professor 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 70%
Environmental Science 9 12%
Philosophy 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2026.
All research outputs
#9,514,662
of 27,776,330 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Biologia
#5
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,776
of 46,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Biologia
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,776,330 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one scored the same or higher as 32 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.