↓ Skip to main content

A sucção não nutritiva do recém-nascido prematuro como uma tecnologia de enfermagem

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A sucção não nutritiva do recém-nascido prematuro como uma tecnologia de enfermagem
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, November 2013
DOI 10.1590/s0034-71672013000500004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joice Cristina Pereira Antunes, Maria Aparecida de Luca Nascimento

Abstract

This is an experimental study with a quantitative approach, whose goal was to demonstrate that non-nutritive sucking is effective in pain management during installation, by the nursing staff, of nasal CPAP in preterm infants; and to demonstrate that the use of non-nutritive sucking, concomitantly with the installation of nasal CPAP can be considered a nursing technology. The target population consisted of 20 preterm infants undergoing installation or reinstallation of this artifact, totaling 30 procedures. The newborns were divided randomly into two groups, control and experimental, in which non-nutritive sucking was offered, the same do not happening with the control group. The reactions of pain were measured by the scale of NIPS. In 100% of the procedures that occurred concomitant with non-nutritive sucking, newborns did not feel pain; and 100% of the newborns showed pain when such suction was not offered. We conclude that the procedure can be classified as a technology of nursing care.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 18 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 20 54%