You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Epidemiology of neurocysticercosis in Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, September 2006
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0036-46651996000300008 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Svetlana Agapejev |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 20% |
Researcher | 3 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 53% |
Materials Science | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#8,713,411
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo
#136
of 791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,704
of 88,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo
#10
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 791 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.