↓ Skip to main content

[NO TITLE AVAILABLE]

Overview of attention for article published in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
[NO TITLE AVAILABLE]
Published in
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, October 2002
DOI 10.1590/s0036-46652002000500013
Authors

C.S. LACAZ, E. PORTO, J.E.C. MARTINS, E.M. HEINS-VACCARI, N. TAKAHASHI DE MELO

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2024.
All research outputs
#10,986,525
of 32,311,788 outputs
Outputs from Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo
#185
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,961
of 67,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,311,788 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.