↓ Skip to main content

CHROMOBLASTOMYCOSIS: A NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASE

Overview of attention for article published in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CHROMOBLASTOMYCOSIS: A NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASE
Published in
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, September 2015
DOI 10.1590/s0036-46652015000700009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flavio QUEIROZ-TELLES

Abstract

SUMMARYChromoblastomycosis (CMB) is a chronic fungal infection of the skin and the subcutaneous tissue caused by a transcutaneous traumatic inoculation of a specific group of dematiaceous fungi occurring mainly in tropical and subtropical zones worldwide. If not diagnosed at early stages, patients with CBM require long term therapy with systemic antifungals, sometimes associated with physical methods. Unlike other neglected endemic mycoses, comparative clinical trials have not been performed for this disease. Nowadays, therapy is based on a few open trials and on expert opinion. Itraconazole either as monotherapy or associated with other drugs, or with physical methods, is widely used. Recently, photodynamic therapy has been successfully employed in combination with antifungals in patients presenting with CBM. In the present revision the most used therapeutic options against CBM are reviewed as well as the several factors that may have impact on the patient's outcome.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 3%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 17 15%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Researcher 9 8%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 31 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 36%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 33 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2017.
All research outputs
#8,745,608
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo
#137
of 791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,638
of 277,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 791 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.