↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp isolated in a teaching maternity hospital in the city of Natal, State of Rio Grande do Norte

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp isolated in a teaching maternity hospital in the city of Natal, State of Rio Grande do Norte
Published in
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, May 2009
DOI 10.1590/s0037-86822009000200017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisco Canindé de Sousa, Éderson William de Figueiredo Nunes, Ermeton Duarte do Nascimento, Solange Maria de Oliveira, Maria Celeste Nunes de Melo, Maria José de Britto Costa Fernandes

Abstract

Analyses on 1,576 clinical specimens from hospitalized patients were performed with the aim of determining the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp isolated in the Januário Cicco Teaching Maternity Hospital in Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, in 2002 and 2003. The samples were collected, processed and identified according to standard procedures, for each clinical specimen. In vitro susceptibility profiles were obtained using the Kirby-Bauer method. 188 strains of Staphylococcus spp were isolated: 105 were identified as Staphylococcus aureus and 83 as coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Staphylococcus aureus was isolated most often in secretions, whereas coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was most prevalent in blood cultures. The high (41.5%) prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp shows the need for immediate prophylactic measures aimed at impeding the dissemination of this phenomenon.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 29%
Student > Master 2 14%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#202
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,961
of 103,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.