↓ Skip to main content

Insights into the clinical and functional significance of cardiac autonomic dysfunction in Chagas disease

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Insights into the clinical and functional significance of cardiac autonomic dysfunction in Chagas disease
Published in
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, April 2012
DOI 10.1590/s0037-86822012000200020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#12,374,524
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#349
of 1,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,069
of 212,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,522 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.